Source Criticism
The Bible gives us three main reasons
to believe that much of the Old Testament comes to us in an edited
and adapted form:
- Some books either tell us that this
is so (see Proverbs 1:1;
10:1; 22:17; 25:1;
30:1; 31:1 where the biblical text tells us new collections
of material begin); or tell us that their author made use of
existing works without specifying in what way (1 Kgs 11:41; 14:19,29
etc.; 1 Chron 29:29)
- On other occasions two books share
the same text, or have text which differs only a little, as examples
compare:
- Is 2:2-4 with
Mic 4:1-5;
- Ps 108:1-5
with Ps 57:7-11;
- Ps 60:5-12
with Ps 108:6-13
- and Isa 39:1-8 with 2 Kings
20:12-19.
- It is clear that the culture described by the Old
Testament is strongly marked by features of tribal life. Tribal cultures give
a high value to tradition and to traditional expression of stories, songs
and ideas. In the context the Bible describes, its writers would naturally
have made use of the traditional material handed on to them, while adapting
it to the needs of their own day.
Scholars have developed a number of criteria to help
distinguish the presence of such material that a writer takes up from their
sources. This activity is known as "source criticism".

This page is part of the Hypertext Bible Commentary - Amos,
© Tim Bulkeley, 1996-2005, Tim
Bulkeley. All rights reserved.